linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC PATCH] ext4: don't split xattr inode refcounts across i_ctime and i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180111224150.GK19241@thunk.org>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:41:50 -0500
From:   Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext4: don't split xattr inode refcounts across
 i_ctime and i_version fields

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:09:03PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> 
> Wouldn't it have made more sense to just store it all in i_version field
> (like this patch makes it do)? If this breaks backward compatibility
> though, then I'm fine with just dropping the patch.

Yes, that part is there for compatibility for the deployed base
(Lustre Servers).

					- Ted