lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87wp0mqt62.fsf@collabora.co.uk> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 02:28:05 -0200 From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.co.uk> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Cc: david@...morbit.com, bpm@....com, olaf@....com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...ts.collabora.co.uk, alvaro.soliverez@...labora.co.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/13] charsets: utf8: Add unicode character database files Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> writes: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 05:12:24AM -0200, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: >> From: Olaf Weber <olaf@....com> >> >> Add files from the Unicode Character Database, version 7.0.0, to the source. >> A helper program that generates a trie used for normalization from these >> files is part of a separate commit. > > It looks like the latest version of Unicode is 10.0.0. Once we pick a > Unicode version, changing will be painful; but in the absence of > interop requirements, is there a reason to stick with Unicode 7? Why > not take the latest version of Unicode and then freeze on it? > Hi Ted, No, there isn't a specific reason for unicode 7 and I forgot to mention this in my cover letter. I have successfully generated the data file for 10.0.0 with the mkutf8data script, but I couldn't validate it entirely yet. I walked through changelogs to make sure any relevant changes where there, but I'm not done yet. You can definitely expect new versions of the patchset to support 10.0.0. Thanks, -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists