[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180118160602.GA21971@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:06:02 -0700
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@...hat.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, dave.jiang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [fstests PATCH 2/2] generic/347: dm-thin lacks DAX support
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:23:43PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 04:23:51PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > generic/347 currently fails when run in cojunction with the DAX mount
> > option:
> >
> > generic/347 72s ... - output mismatch (see
> > /root/project/xfstests/results//generic/347.out.bad)
> > --- tests/generic/347.out 2016-05-12 11:56:32.086618744 -0600
> > +++ /root/project/xfstests/results//generic/347.out.bad 2018-01-17
> > 16:04:33.459348448 -0700
> > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> > QA output created by 347
> > +mount: /mnt/xfstests_scratch: can't read superblock on
> > /dev/mapper/thin-vol.
> > === completed
> > ...
> > (Run 'diff -u tests/generic/347.out
> > /root/project/xfstests/results//generic/347.out.bad' to see the entire
> > diff)
> >
> > This is expected because the dm-thin target currently lacks DAX support.
> >
> > Just skip this test if we are using DAX.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/generic/347 | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/generic/347 b/tests/generic/347
> > index 3adc6744..0c2dec98 100755
> > --- a/tests/generic/347
> > +++ b/tests/generic/347
> > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ _supported_fs generic
> > _supported_os Linux
> > _require_scratch_nocheck
> > _require_dm_target thin-pool
> > +_exclude_scratch_mount_option dax
>
> IMHO, it'd be better to put this in common/dmthin file, as what's done
> in common/dmerror or common/dmflakey (we grep for dax directly there,
> that's because they've been added before _exclude_scratch_mount_option
> was introduced), so all thinp tests are excluded from dax tests.
Sure, will do. Thanks for the review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists