linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1517341375.3658.12.camel@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:42:55 -0500
From:   Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To:     Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...marydata.com>,
        "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iversion: make inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool
 instead of s64

On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 17:50 +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 12:31 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> > 
> > As Linus points out:
> > 
> >     The inode_cmp_iversion{+raw}() functions are pure and utter crap.
> > 
> >     Why?
> > 
> >     You say that they return 0/negative/positive, but they do so in a
> >     completely broken manner. They return that ternary value as the
> >     sequence number difference in a 's64', which means that if you
> >     actually care about that ternary value, and do the *sane* thing
> > that
> >     the kernel-doc of the function implies is the right thing, you
> > would
> >     do
> > 
> >         int cmp = inode_cmp_iversion(inode, old);
> >         if (cmp < 0 ...
> > 
> >     and as a result you get code that looks sane, but that doesn't
> >     actually *WORK* right.
> > 
> > Since none of the callers actually care about the ternary value here,
> > convert the inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} functions to just return a
> > boolean
> > value (false for matching, true for non-matching).
> > 
> > This matches the existing use of these functions just fine, and makes
> > it
> > simple to convert them to return a ternary value in the future if we
> > grow callers that need it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/iversion.h | 20 +++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iversion.h b/include/linux/iversion.h
> > index 858463fca249..ace32775c5f0 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iversion.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iversion.h
> > @@ -309,13 +309,13 @@ inode_query_iversion(struct inode *inode)
> >   * @inode: inode to check
> >   * @old: old value to check against its i_version
> >   *
> > - * Compare the current raw i_version counter with a previous one.
> > Returns 0 if
> > - * they are the same or non-zero if they are different.
> > + * Compare the current raw i_version counter with a previous one.
> > Returns false
> > + * if they are the same or true if they are different.
> >   */
> > -static inline s64
> > +static inline bool
> >  inode_cmp_iversion_raw(const struct inode *inode, u64 old)
> >  {
> > -	return (s64)inode_peek_iversion_raw(inode) - (s64)old;
> > +	return inode_peek_iversion_raw(inode) != old;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -323,19 +323,17 @@ inode_cmp_iversion_raw(const struct inode
> > *inode, u64 old)
> >   * @inode: inode to check
> >   * @old: old value to check against its i_version
> >   *
> > - * Compare an i_version counter with a previous one. Returns 0 if
> > they are
> > - * the same, a positive value if the one in the inode appears newer
> > than @old,
> > - * and a negative value if @old appears to be newer than the one in
> > the
> > - * inode.
> > + * Compare an i_version counter with a previous one. Returns false
> > if they are
> > + * the same, and true if they are different.
> >   *
> >   * Note that we don't need to set the QUERIED flag in this case, as
> > the value
> >   * in the inode is not being recorded for later use.
> >   */
> >  
> > -static inline s64
> > +static inline bool
> >  inode_cmp_iversion(const struct inode *inode, u64 old)
> >  {
> > -	return (s64)(inode_peek_iversion_raw(inode) &
> > ~I_VERSION_QUERIED) -
> > -	       (s64)(old << I_VERSION_QUERIED_SHIFT);
> > +	return (inode_peek_iversion_raw(inode) & ~I_VERSION_QUERIED)
> > !=
> > +			(old << I_VERSION_QUERIED_SHIFT);
> >  }
> 
> Is there any reason why this couldn't just use inode_peek_iversion()
> instead of having to both mask the output from
> inode_peek_iversion_raw() and shift 'old'?

None at all. I'll send a v2.
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>