[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1fb20a12-8482-fea8-1db2-ff764216ea19@meituan.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 10:29:40 +0800
From: Wang Long <wanglong19@...tuan.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: set to NULL after kmem_cache_destroy
On 6/2/2018 1:00 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:39:17PM +0800, Wang Long wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Long <wanglong19@...tuan.com>
>> ---
>> fs/jbd2/journal.c | 9 ++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> index 93016bb..38dc24c 100644
>> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> @@ -2649,11 +2649,14 @@ static int __init jbd2_journal_init_handle_cache(void)
>>
>> static void jbd2_journal_destroy_handle_cache(void)
>> {
>> - if (jbd2_handle_cache)
>> + if (jbd2_handle_cache) {
>> kmem_cache_destroy(jbd2_handle_cache);
> kmem_cache_destroy already handles null pointers, so you can remove the
> conditional test entirely.
>
> --D
Thanks, I will send another patch to remove all conditional test in
module JBD2.
>> - if (jbd2_inode_cache)
>> + jbd2_handle_cache = NULL;
>> + }
>> + if (jbd2_inode_cache) {
>> kmem_cache_destroy(jbd2_inode_cache);
>> -
>> + jbd2_inode_cache = NULL;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists