[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5e50711-77d9-d1d2-35f4-3b656c8e895c@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:12:20 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Evgeniy Didin <Evgeniy.Didin@...opsys.com>
Cc: "jh80.chung@...sung.com" <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
"Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"adilger.kernel@...ger.ca" <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com" <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mmc: block: bonnie++ runs with errors on arc/hsdk board
On 15/03/18 17:08, Evgeniy Didin wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
>> On 14/03/18 14:32, Evgeniy Didin wrote:
>>> Hi Adrian,
>>>>>
>>>>> Was the performance affected? i.e. the results from bonnie++
>>>>
>>>> I have run bonnie++ several times before and after mentioned commit. Here is output:
>>>> --------------------------------------------------<8-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Before commit:
>>>> ARCLinux,512M,6442,50,7211,0,5333,0,12954,99,345638,100,+++++,+++,16,22322,100,+++++,+++,32735,99,22921,100,+++++,+++,32211,100
>>>> ARCLinux,512M,6611,51,7248,0,5162,0,12951,99,344763,99,+++++,+++,16,22649,99,+++++,+++,32723,99,22572,100,+++++,+++,31697,100
>>>> ARCLinux,512M,6597,52,7307,0,5368,0,12934,99,343987,99,+++++,+++,16,22775,100,+++++,+++,32713,99,22832,100,+++++,+++,31899,99
>>>> After commit:
>>>> ARCLinux,512M,4453,36,6474,1,5852,0,12940,99,344329,100,+++++,+++,16,22168,98,+++++,+++,32760,99,22755,100,+++++,+++,32205,100
>>>> ARCLinux,512M,5159,42,6944,1,5658,0,12945,99,344290,100,+++++,+++,16,22295,100,+++++,+++,32715,99,22888,99,+++++,+++,32007,99
>>>> ARCLinux,512M,5170,42,6840,2,5315,0,12946,99,343889,100,+++++,+++,16,22445,100,+++++,+++,32681,99,22967,100,+++++,+++,32117,99
>>>> --------------------------------------------------<8------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ^^^^
>>>> If i understand correctly, in third column is shown "sequential output" per character speed (K/sec), which decreased.
>>>>
>>>>> What mount options did you use?
>>>>
>>>> I didn't use any options. Simply:
>>>> # mount /dev/mmcblk0p1 /mnt
>>>
>>> Note that the file system on SDcard was ext4.
>>
>> Please try:
>>
>> perf record -a -e mmc:* -- bonnie++ -u root -r 256 -s 512 -x 1 -d /mnt
>> and share the resulting perf.data file when you are able
>> to reproduce the hung task message.
>>
>
> I have applied the patch below and collected perf.data using command above, hung message also appeared. Is this the information you needed?
> (perf.data is in attachments to this
> message).
Yes. Unfortunately the clock used is not accurate enough to correctly order
the events across different CPUs, which makes it very hard to see delays
between requests. You could try a different clock - refer the --clockid
option to perf record.
Nevertheless it shows there are no I/O errors which means the error recovery
can be ruled out as a problem.
The issue could be caused by the I/O scheduler. Under blk-mq the default
scheduler is the mq-deadline scheduler whereas without blk-mq you would
probably have been using cfq by default. You could try the bfq scheduler:
echo bfq > /sys/block/mmcblk0/queue/scheduler
But you might need to add it to the kernel config i.e.
CONFIG_IOSCHED_BFQ=y
Alternatively you could fiddle with the scheduler parameters:
With mq-deadline they are:
# grep -H . /sys/block/mmcblk0/queue/iosched/*
/sys/block/mmcblk0/queue/iosched/fifo_batch:16
/sys/block/mmcblk0/queue/iosched/front_merges:1
/sys/block/mmcblk0/queue/iosched/read_expire:500
/sys/block/mmcblk0/queue/iosched/write_expire:5000
/sys/block/mmcblk0/queue/iosched/writes_starved:2
You could try decreasing the write_expire and/or fifo_batch.
>
>> You may want to add this patch first:
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__marc.info_-3Fl-3Dlinux-2Dmmc-26m-3D152110580324200&d=DwIDaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=vQk-RIbjwN0zvlwiMSpq3LYUTNf7Gqc4
>> ujhosYITtAw&m=LeVFmgzU0ydw-qHaAVh-kZI-v4mldnCycYxIGxqDexU&s=SyGvsVJBOzegO2Mz3hQ5j6CY8KrjLWJERVHfosSmKSs&e=
>
> Best regards,
> Evgeniy Didin
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists