[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bug-199181-13602-SSSVTtCmJG@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 06:30:58 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...nel.org
Subject: [Bug 199181] Out-of-bound access in ext4_valid_block_bitmap when
mounting and operating on a crafted ext4 image
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199181
--- Comment #3 from Theodore Tso (tytso@....edu) ---
Thanks for the bug report. The following should address the problem
you have reported.
commit 25584a8748b1f5404abcdc87c9fac21681eec5d2
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Date: Sat Mar 24 01:48:34 2018 -0400
ext4: add validity checks for bitmap block numbers
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199181
Reported-by: Wen Xu <wen.xu@...ech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index f82c4966f4ce..a33d8fb1bf2a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -338,20 +338,25 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bitmap(struct
super_block *sb,
/* check whether block bitmap block number is set */
blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc);
offset = blk - group_first_block;
- if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
+ if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize ||
+ !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
/* bad block bitmap */
return blk;
/* check whether the inode bitmap block number is set */
blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc);
offset = blk - group_first_block;
- if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
+ if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize ||
+ !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
/* bad block bitmap */
return blk;
/* check whether the inode table block number is set */
blk = ext4_inode_table(sb, desc);
offset = blk - group_first_block;
+ if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize ||
+ EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) >= sb->s_blocksize)
+ return blk;
next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data,
EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group),
EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset));
@@ -417,6 +422,7 @@ struct buffer_head *
ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t
block_group)
{
struct ext4_group_desc *desc;
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct buffer_head *bh;
ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk;
int err;
@@ -425,6 +431,12 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb,
ext4_group_t block_group)
if (!desc)
return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
bitmap_blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc);
+ if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
+ (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) {
+ ext4_error(sb, "Invalid block bitmap block %llu in "
+ "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
+ }
bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk);
if (unlikely(!bh)) {
ext4_error(sb, "Cannot get buffer for block bitmap - "
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
index 3fa93665b4a3..df92e3ec9913 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static struct buffer_head *
ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
{
struct ext4_group_desc *desc;
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk;
int err;
@@ -131,6 +132,12 @@ ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
ext4_group_t block_group)
return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
bitmap_blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc);
+ if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) ||
+ (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) {
+ ext4_error(sb, "Invalid inode bitmap blk %llu in "
+ "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
+ }
bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk);
if (unlikely(!bh)) {
ext4_error(sb, "Cannot read inode bitmap - "
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists