lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180326060533.GC15608@thunk.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 02:05:33 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 07/11] fscrypt_zeroout_range: Encrypt all zeroed
 out blocks of a page

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:27:24PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> 
> You are right. I will fix that up in the next iteration of the patchset.
>

Hi Chandan,

When were you planning on sending out the next iteration of the
patchset?  The merge window will be opening soon, and I wasn't sure if
I had missed a new iteration of your changes.ts

Also, it looks like when you renamed the *_page fscrypt functions to
*_blocks, on the write side, a bounce page is still being used for
each block.  So so an an architecture which has 64k pages, and we are
writing to a file sytem with 4k blocks, to write a 64k page, the
fscrypt layer will have to allocate 16 64k bounce pages to write a
single 64k page to an encrypted file.  Am I missing something?

Thanks,

					- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ