linux-ext4 - Re: [Patch 0/4] RFC : Support for data gradation of a single file.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180410233948.GE729@dastard>
Date:   Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:39:48 +1000
From:   Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:     Sayan Ghosh <sgdgp.2014@...il.com>
Cc:     Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
        "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Bhattacharya, Suparna" <suparna.bhattacharya@....com>,
        niloy ganguly <ganguly.niloy@...il.com>,
        Madhumita Mallick <madhu.cse.ju@...il.com>,
        "Bharde, Madhumita" <madhumita.bharde@....com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/4] RFC : Support for data gradation of a single file.

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:26:11PM +0530, Sayan Ghosh wrote:
> > That said, having a hard-coded separation of flash vs. disks does not
> > make sense, even from an intermediate development point of view.  There
> > definitely should be a block-device interface for querying what the
> > actual layout is, perhaps something like the SMR zones?
> 
> Yes, I agree, that the ideal situation would be to have a mechanism to
> identify the segment boundaries automatically inside the LVM. But we
> were not able to get a method to access the boundaries or rather the
> location of a free block in each segment by such system call.
> So, in order to just test out the system we proceeded by hardcoding
> the boundaries as per our simulated LVM. But since this is not
> practical we provided the TODO/FIX IT in those areas. We are still
> looking for a good mechanism, and would welcome any
> advice/suggestions.
> 
> Also, we chose to use Ext4 since it is generally the most commonly
> used file system in linux based systems. However, I am not aware if
> the problem of getting the boundaries can be solved in a simpler
> manner by using XFS.

SSD for the data device, HDD for the realtime device, device
auto-selection based on initial allocation size patchset like this
one:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=151190613327238&w=2

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com