[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANQeFDD+VvSBnrsXi0cVuiLAPtPT6PRC92gLwWuyok63ZhMWzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 19:20:39 -0700
From: Liu Bo <obuil.liubo@...il.com>
To: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, adilger@...ger.ca,
Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>, wshilong@....com,
sihara@....com, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: mark block bitmap corrupted when found
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>
>
> There are still some cases that we missed to set
> block bitmaps corrupted bit properly:
>
> 1) block bitmap number is wrong.
> 2) failed to read block bitmap due to disk errors.
> 3) double free block bitmaps..
> 4) some mismatch check with bitmaps vs buddy information.
>
> Suggested-by: Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/balloc.c | 4 ++++
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> index 0ac442aff7b8..8ef65251d019 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> @@ -420,6 +420,8 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
> (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) {
> ext4_error(sb, "Invalid block bitmap block %llu in "
> "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group);
> + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, block_group,
> + EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
> return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED);
> }
> bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk);
> @@ -498,6 +500,8 @@ int ext4_wait_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group,
> ext4_error(sb, "Cannot read block bitmap - "
> "block_group = %u, block_bitmap = %llu",
> block_group, (unsigned long long) bh->b_blocknr);
> + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, block_group,
> + EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
For this particular part, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>
thanks,
liubo
> return -EIO;
> }
> clear_buffer_new(bh);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index bc2d1eb9fd5d..0d473991eebd 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -470,6 +470,8 @@ static void mb_free_blocks_double(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
> "freeing block already freed "
> "(bit %u)",
> first + i);
> + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
> + EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
> }
> mb_clear_bit(first + i, e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap);
> }
> @@ -1950,6 +1952,8 @@ void ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> "%d free clusters as per "
> "group info. But bitmap says 0",
> free);
> + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
> + EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -1960,6 +1964,8 @@ void ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> "%d free clusters as per "
> "group info. But got %d blocks",
> free, ex.fe_len);
> + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(sb, e4b->bd_group,
> + EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT);
> /*
> * The number of free blocks differs. This mostly
> * indicate that the bitmap is corrupt. So exit
> --
> 2.14.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists