lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Apr 2018 11:49:57 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Viktor Prutyanov <viktor.prutyanov@...tuozzo.com>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] dumpe2fs: add JSON output format

These patches are in my git tree.  Unfortunately since they break
builds with shared library enabled, I didn't want to merge them into
the primary master or next branches just yet.

So I've resurrected something which we haven't used for a while, which
is the "proposed updates", or pu branch.  The pu branch is a rewinding
branch, like linux-next[1], so developers should not try to base any
of their branches on it.  It's there so people can see what is "on
deck" for merging into the next branch.  In my internal tree I have
one or more topic branches (in this case, it's "vp/json-dumpe2fs")
which get merged into the pu branch, which is based off of the next
branch when I rebuild it.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/linux-next.html

The pu branch is based on the workflow[2] used by the git developers.

[2] https://git-scm.com/docs/gitworkflows

See my other e-mail about my proposal regarding moving the json
support functions to libe2p and what that would require/imply.

						- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ