[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1804261118050.8@nippy.intranet>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:45:50 +1000 (AEST)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/40] proc: introduce proc_create_single{,_data}
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> -/*
> - * /proc/nubus stuff
> - */
> -
I don't think that the introduction of proc_create_single{,_data} alters
the value of that comment. That comment and similar comments in the same
file do have a purpose, which is to keep separate the /proc/nubus
implementation is kept separate from the /proc/bus/nubus/devices
implementation and so on.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists