[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2cjQugQYcqBN0RLhgG2kX+Pr0S=vWvWNFyFN7ruE-t+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:15:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ext4: use timespec64 for all inode times
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Wed 20-06-18 17:33:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> -static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time)
>> +static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec64 *time)
>> {
>> u32 extra = sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 ?
>
> I suppose this condition can be removed now.
Right, good point. I also verified that we have no other similar
constructs in the kernel any more now.
>> ((time->tv_sec - (s32)time->tv_sec) >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK : 0;
>> return cpu_to_le32(extra | (time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS));
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time(struct timespec *time, __le32 extra)
>> +static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time(struct timespec64 *time, __le32 extra)
>
> Wrap?
Ok, done.
> Otherwise the patch looks good.
Thanks!
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists