linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/1] iomap: Direct I/O for inline data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Jun 2018 19:02:07 +0200
From:   Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc:     cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
        linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iomap: Direct I/O for inline data

On 29 June 2018 at 18:01, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 04:40:40PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> On 29 June 2018 at 10:56, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>> > This looks generally fine.  But I think it might be worth refactoring
>> > iomap_dio_actor a bit first, e.g. something like this new patch
>> > before yours, which would also nicely solve your alignmnet concern
>> > (entirely untested for now):
>>
>> This looks correct. I've rebased my patches on top of it and I ran the
>> xfstest auto group on gfs2 and xfs on top.
>>
>> Can you push this to your gfs2-iomap branch? I'll then repost an
>> updated version of "iomap: Direct I/O for inline data".
>
> Darrick now has a real iomap merge branch which replaced it.

Where is it? Not in
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux.git
it seems.

>  Before formally submitting the patch I'd also like to verify that it does
> not regress for XFS by doing a full xfstests run.

Thanks,
Andreas