[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93aa59853a491a5ba3d5c3bcc0c991a1b815a67d.camel@darmarit.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 18:58:57 +0200
From: Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sphinx version dependencies?
Am Freitag, den 20.07.2018, 09:44 -0700 schrieb Darrick J. Wong:
> and now I'm just confused since 16.04 has the same version of docutils
> and an older sphinx and runs fine; but 18.04 has newer docutils and
> newer sphinx and runs fine.
Same here .. I'am completely confused by distros etc. .. I will never be able to
control that. Thats why I recommend the virtualenv workflow (as I wrote Christoph):
$ sudo apt install python3-virtualenv
To setup up a environment for building htmldocs:
$ python3 -m virtualenv py3env
$ ./py3env/bin/pip install -r ./Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt
To build htmldocs with:
$ SPHINXBUILD=./py3env/bin/sphinx-build make htmldocs
If the env is no longer needed:
$ rm -r py3env
Am Freitag, den 20.07.2018, 09:44 -0700 schrieb Darrick J. Wong:
> Yes. This makes writing broadly portable markup difficult -- originally
> I did not take the '=' all the way to the right edge of the table
> because I saw that last example in the above document and assumed that
> it wasn't necessary to extend the '=' all the way to the right edge.
> Neither Ubuntu system choked on it, so is this a bug in upstream? Some
> strange patch added by the distro? Something that ended up in the
> python wheel? Or a bug in the spec?
I guess in the version history of docutils ;) .. use workflow above to escape
from distro chaos. Even missing '=' will be OK.
-- Markus --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists