linux-ext4 - Re: Sphinx version dependencies?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c30a215-b67a-1e42-2e7d-078882125094@darmarit.de>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jul 2018 23:28:34 +0200
From:   Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
To:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sphinx version dependencies?

On 20.07.2018 22:43, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> So if Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt is the only thing which is
> guaranteed to work, that's fine.  But it might be good to document
> that somewhere.

Hm, I read it again and I guess this is more ore less what the documentation
will say, see 'Sphinx Install' section. [1]

- distros are fragile
- Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt is the reference environment

.. even if this needs a virtualenv on specific distros. But what is with
the offline build systems Christoph mentioned? I can't see a solution on
the sometimes contradictory requirements on a *reference env* and the package
reposetorie of a distro.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/doc-guide/sphinx.html?#sphinx-install

--Markus--