[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180916122034.GA5915@thunk.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 08:20:34 -0400
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>
Cc: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"dchinner@...hat.com" <dchinner@...hat.com>,
"adilger@...ger.ca" <adilger@...ger.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ext4: fix setattr project check upon fssetxattr
ioctl
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 04:02:52AM +0000, Wang Shilong wrote:
>
>
> > 在 2018年9月16日,上午11:55,Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@....edu> 写道:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 08:57:16AM +0900, Wang Shilong wrote:
> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> >> index a7074115d6f6..f81102bd3203 100644
> >> --- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> >> +++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
> >> @@ -339,19 +339,14 @@ static int ext4_ioctl_setproject(struct file *filp, __u32 projid)
> >> if (projid_eq(kprojid, EXT4_I(inode)->i_projid))
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> - err = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
> >> - if (err)
> >> - return err;
> >> -
> >
> > A huge part of this patch is dropping the calls to
> > mnt_want_write_file() and mnt_drop_write_file(). What's the
> > justification for doing this? The use of mnt_want_write_file() looks
> > necessary to me…
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> mnt_want_write_file() and inode_lock is held before this function called now.
> Since both ioctl_set_flags and ext4_set_project() need call them.
I don't see any place in this patch where mnt_want_write_file() is
being called. What am I missing? And if there is a dependent patch
to this first patch in the patch series, please include it in this
patch series.... or least point it out after the --- list.
Thanks,
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists