[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmt4-jFv6d-ZVUH5OOvXSz38jpuNvQy-jtoSS3xEoh78A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:16:27 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, olof@...m.net,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@...gle.com>,
sandipan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
paul.burton@...s.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, msebor@...il.com, sparse@...isli.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, joe@...ches.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, asmadeus@...ewreck.org,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL linux-next] Add Compiler Attributes tree
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 2:11 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Miguel,
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 15:47:12 +0200 Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Compiler Attributes series has been stable for 10+ days. To
> > increase testing before 4.20, I would to request it being picked up
> > for -next.
> >
> > The changes w.r.t. v5 in the LKML:
> >
> > - Rebased on top of next-20180928, which required removing
>
> Unfortunately, trees/branches included in linux-next must be based on
> something stable (usually Linus' tree, but it could be another
> tree/branch that is included in linux-next that does not rebase).
> Linux-next itself rebases every day, so snything based on it would drag
> in a previous version of all the other trees :-(
I think of this like a branch that's force pushed to. Can't base
other branches or trees off of it cause it's always moving/force
rewriting history.
>
> > aligned_largest, which was removed by 9503cd9cbaba
> > ("include/linux/compiler*.h: add version detection to
> > asm_volatile_goto").
>
> That commit is from Andrew's patch series which also rebases (usually
> at least every week), so you cannot depend on it.
Miguel, you should be able to drop that patch from your set then,
since Andrew's -mm tree flows into this -next tree as well, IIUC.
We'll take up that patch from there.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists