linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 21/25] ext4: Add encoding mount options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181007192221.GB10662@thunk.org>
Date:   Sun, 7 Oct 2018 15:22:21 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.co.uk>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 21/25] ext4: Add encoding mount options

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 05:56:51PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> This patch implements two new mount options for ext4: encoding and
> encoding_flags.
> 
> The encoding option receives a string that identifies the NLS encoding
> to be used when mounting the filesystem.  The user can optionally ask
> for a specific version by appending the version string after a dash.
> 
> The encoding_flags argument allows the user to specify how the NLS
> charset must behave.  The exact behavior of the flags are defined at
> ext4.h.
> 
> encoding_flags is ignored if the user didn't provide an encoding.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.co.uk>

It seems to me that adding support for setting the encoding parameters
via mount options is a bad idea.  The encoding is going to impact
directory hash; which means if the file system has directories created
using, say, ASCII as its encoding, and then the encoding changes to
UTF-8, directory lookups won't work correctly.  So I think this commit
needs to be dropped, and support for setting the encoding needs to be
added to e2fsprogs as the primary way encoding settings are made.

We need e2fsprogs support before this feature is ready for production
use, since e2fsck needs to be able to properly rebuild directories.

Do you agree?

						- Ted