[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bug-201461-13602-ygWJmWSVby@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:22:47 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 201461] ext4 journal stalls write system call
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201461
zhenbianshu@...mail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from zhenbianshu@...mail.com ---
(In reply to Theodore Tso from comment #5)
> Keep in mind that 3.10 was released over ***five years*** ago. Quite
> frankly, using a 3.10 kernel borders on malpractice, since it has so many
> unpatched security holes it isn't funny. If you are talking about a RHEL
> kernel, it has diverged significantly from mainline and whether or not it is
> a security disaster is between you and your Red Hat support contract. :-)
>
> My comments apply mainly to the the upstream development kernel, but to
> answer your questions:
>
> No, in 3.10, generic_writepages() does not call ext4_da_writepages(). And
> ext4_da_writepages roughly corresponds to what ext4_writepages() in
> non-obsolete kernels.
>
> A huge number of things have changed between 3.10 and more modern kernels,
> including many performance enhancements. So some of the details have
> changed.
I got it, thank you very much!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists