[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdn9hOcF01eOmwfnrH_ciFZ4fPaspSzMPiY68o3B0En-VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:54:27 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, olof@...m.net,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@...gle.com>,
sandipan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
paul.burton@...s.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, msebor@...il.com, sparse@...isli.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, joe@...ches.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, asmadeus@...ewreck.org,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Compiler Attributes: __fallthrough
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:48 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:29 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Will this work with all of the static tools that are currently looking
> > for the comment instead? I know coverity handles that, what about
> > others?
>
> I will also contact the different tools about this.
Let's contact the authors of these tools if they don't parse the
attribute. I prefer to have the attributes rather than specifically
formatted comments.
I do think this may be tricky to provide backwards support for though;
Miguel, do you have info on which versions of GCC support comments vs
attribute?
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists