[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181105070256.52c6fd8f@mschwideX1>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 07:02:56 +0100
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, olof@...m.net,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, paullawrence@...gle.com,
sandipan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, andreyknvl@...gle.com,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, will.deacon@....com,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
paul.burton@...s.com, rientjes@...gle.com, w@....eu,
msebor@...il.com, Chris Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, joe@...ches.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, asmadeus@...ewreck.org,
stefan@...er.ch, luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Compiler Attributes for v4.20-rc1
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 09:09:32 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:43 AM Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> >
> > You're right, version checks shouldn't matter here. But __no_sanitize_address_or_inline
> > shouldn't have been added in the first place, because we already have almost the same
> >__no_kasan_or_inline:
>
> Ahh, very good.
>
> Vasily, Martin - since __no_sanitize_address_or_inline was added just
> for s390, would you mind replacing it with __no_kasan_or_inline
> instead, and testing that in whatever failed before?
>
> Then we can just remove that unnecessary symbol #define entirely..
Ok, will do.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists