[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181107153330.GC9919@thunk.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:33:30 -0500
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ext4: possible sbi->s_group_desc leak in
ext4_fill_super
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:12:27PM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
> Fixes bfe0a5f47ada ("ext4: add more mount time checks of the superblock") # 4.18
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index a221f1cdf704..ed4d36506ec2 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -4100,7 +4100,8 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> le32_to_cpu(es->s_inodes_count),
> ((u64)sbi->s_groups_count * sbi->s_inodes_per_group));
> ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto failed_mount;
> + db_count = 0;
> + goto failed_mount2;
> }
>
> bgl_lock_init(sbi->s_blockgroup_lock);
Thanks for spotting this!
A better fix would be to move this check earlier, before the
allocation of sbi->s_group_desc.
- Ted
commit 9fa8bc9b9d3c6864f8dddd83893a02fcc1b48b62
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Date: Wed Nov 7 10:32:53 2018 -0500
ext4: fix possible leak of sbi->s_group_desc_leak in error path
Fixes: bfe0a5f47ada ("ext4: add more mount time checks of the superblock")
Reported-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...nel.org # 4.18
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index a221f1cdf704..92092b55db1e 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4075,6 +4075,14 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
sbi->s_groups_count = blocks_count;
sbi->s_blockfile_groups = min_t(ext4_group_t, sbi->s_groups_count,
(EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_FILE_PHYS / EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)));
+ if (((u64)sbi->s_groups_count * sbi->s_inodes_per_group) !=
+ le32_to_cpu(es->s_inodes_count)) {
+ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "inodes count not valid: %u vs %llu",
+ le32_to_cpu(es->s_inodes_count),
+ ((u64)sbi->s_groups_count * sbi->s_inodes_per_group));
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto failed_mount;
+ }
db_count = (sbi->s_groups_count + EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) - 1) /
EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb);
if (ext4_has_feature_meta_bg(sb)) {
@@ -4094,14 +4102,6 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto failed_mount;
}
- if (((u64)sbi->s_groups_count * sbi->s_inodes_per_group) !=
- le32_to_cpu(es->s_inodes_count)) {
- ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "inodes count not valid: %u vs %llu",
- le32_to_cpu(es->s_inodes_count),
- ((u64)sbi->s_groups_count * sbi->s_inodes_per_group));
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto failed_mount;
- }
bgl_lock_init(sbi->s_blockgroup_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists