[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55574e0e-01a9-3cad-34ab-251e340fb78e@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 08:49:48 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ext4: missing !bh check in ext4_xattr_inode_write()
According to Ted Ts'o ext4_getblk() called in ext4_xattr_inode_write()
should not return bh = NULL
The only time that bh could be NULL, then, would be in the case of
something really going wrong; a programming error elsewhere (perhaps a
wild pointer dereference) or I/O error causing on-disk file system
corruption (although that would be highly unlikely given that we had
*just* allocated the blocks and so the metadata blocks in question
probably would still be in the cache).
Fixes e50e5129f384 ("ext4: xattr-in-inode support")
Cc: stable@...nel.org # 4.13
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
---
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
index 0b9688683526..7643d52c776c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -1384,6 +1384,12 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_write(handle_t *handle, struct inode *ea_inode,
bh = ext4_getblk(handle, ea_inode, block, 0);
if (IS_ERR(bh))
return PTR_ERR(bh);
+ if (!bh) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ EXT4_ERROR_INODE(ea_inode,
+ "ext4_getblk() return bh = NULL");
+ return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+ }
ret = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, bh);
if (ret)
goto out;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists