linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH V10 18/19] block: kill QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181116164028.GW23828@vader>
Date:   Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:40:28 -0800
From:   Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
        linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
        Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>,
        Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 18/19] block: kill QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 02:59:22PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 06:18:11PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > This commit message wasn't very clear. Is it the case that
> > QUEUE_FLAG_NO_SG_MERGE is no longer set by any drivers?
> 
> I think he wants to say that not doing S/G merging is rather pointless
> with the current setup of the I/O path, as it isn't going to save
> you a significant amount of cycles.

Okay, that makes sense. Ming, you can add

Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>