[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181121154812.GD19111@ming.t460p>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:48:13 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 15/19] block: enable multipage bvecs
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 03:55:02PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:23:23AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > if (bio->bi_vcnt > 0) {
> > - struct bio_vec *bv = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
> > + struct bio_vec bv;
> > + struct bio_vec *seg = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
> >
> > - if (page == bv->bv_page && off == bv->bv_offset + bv->bv_len) {
> > - bv->bv_len += len;
> > + bvec_last_segment(seg, &bv);
> > +
> > + if (page == bv.bv_page && off == bv.bv_offset + bv.bv_len) {
>
> I think this we can simplify the try to merge into bio case a bit,
> and also document it better with something like this:
>
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index 854676edc438..cc913281a723 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -822,54 +822,40 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_pc_page);
> * @page: page to add
> * @len: length of the data to add
> * @off: offset of the data in @page
> + * @same_page: if %true only merge if the new data is in the same physical
> + * page as the last segment of the bio.
> *
> - * Try to add the data at @page + @off to the last page of @bio. This is a
> + * Try to add the data at @page + @off to the last bvec of @bio. This is a
> * a useful optimisation for file systems with a block size smaller than the
> * page size.
> *
> * Return %true on success or %false on failure.
> */
> bool __bio_try_merge_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
> - unsigned int len, unsigned int off)
> + unsigned int len, unsigned int off, bool same_page)
> {
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED)))
> return false;
>
> if (bio->bi_vcnt > 0) {
> - struct bio_vec bv;
> - struct bio_vec *seg = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
> -
> - bvec_last_segment(seg, &bv);
> -
> - if (page == bv.bv_page && off == bv.bv_offset + bv.bv_len) {
> - seg->bv_len += len;
> - bio->bi_iter.bi_size += len;
> - return true;
> - }
> + struct bio_vec *bv = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
> + phys_addr_t vec_addr = page_to_phys(bv->bv_page);
> + phys_addr_t page_addr = page_to_phys(page);
> +
> + if (vec_addr + bv->bv_offset + bv->bv_len != page_addr + off)
> + return false;
> + if (same_page &&
> + (vec_addr & PAGE_SIZE) != (page_addr & PAGE_SIZE))
> + return false;
I guess the correct check should be:
end_addr = vec_addr + bv->bv_offset + bv->bv_len;
if (same_page &&
(end_addr & PAGE_MASK) != (page_addr & PAGE_MASK))
return false;
And this approach is good, will take it in V12.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists