linux-ext4 - [Bug 201685] ext4 file system corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bug-201685-13602-K7E7LEU7wM@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date:   Mon, 03 Dec 2018 03:51:16 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 201685] ext4 file system corruption

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685

--- Comment #187 from Eric Benoit (eric@...s.ca) ---
(In reply to Theodore Tso from comment #183)
> Eric, re #180, could you upload your .config file for your kernel and the
> boot-command line?   I'm interested in particular what I/O scheduler you are
> using.   And are you using the same .config and boot command line (and other
> system configurations) on your other system where you were seeing the
> problem?  Many thanks!!

[    0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/root@...ot/vmlinuz root=simcoe/root
triggers=zfs radeon.dpm=1

# cat /sys/block/sd[a-d]/queue/scheduler    
[none] 
[none] 
[none] 
[none] 

The config between 4.18.20 and 4.19.6 are about as identical as possible, the
only differences being whatever was added in 4.19 and prompted by make
oldconfig.

Between this machine and the other (a server) the only differences would be in
specific hardware support and options suitable for that application. In terms
of schedulers, block devices, and filesystem support, they're the same.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.