lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 04 Dec 2018 18:29:49 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 201685] ext4 file system corruption

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685

--- Comment #229 from Jens Axboe (axboe@...nel.dk) ---
(In reply to Guenter Roeck from comment #228)
> I guess I should have been more specific. With CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=y (or
> scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1), cfq is not available. That applies to any kernel
> version with CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=y (or scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1), not just
> to 4.19, and it doesn't apply to 4.19 if CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=n (or
> scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=0).
> 
> It is quite irrelevant if other schedulers are available if
> CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT=y (or scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1). cfq is not available,
> and it doesn't matter if it is set as default or not.
> 
> I hope this is specific enough this time. My apologies if I missed some
> other means to enable or disable blk_mq.

My clarification was for Steven, not you.

In terms of scheduler, CFQ will change the patterns a lot. For the non-mq case,
I'd recommend using noop or deadline for testing, otherwise I fear we're
testing a lot more than mq vs non-mq.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ