lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181210052546.GH1840@mit.edu>
Date:   Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:25:46 -0500
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@....com>
Cc:     adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: compare old and new mode before setting
 update_mode flag

On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 05:01:52PM +0800, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> If new mode is the same as old mode we don't have to reset
> inode mode in the rest of the code, so compare old and new
> mode before setting update_mode flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@....com>

Thanks, applied.

I know Jan declined the equivalent patch for ext2; but it doesn't add
_that_ much extra complexity, and ext4_mark_inode_dirty() is rather
more heavyweight than ext2_mark_inode_dirty().

						- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ