lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bug-201631-13602-gbPaC4W8nw@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:45:50 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 201631] WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 29593 at fs/ext4/inode.c:3927
 .ext4_set_page_dirty+0x70/0xb0

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201631

--- Comment #19 from Jan Kara (jack@...e.cz) ---
Hum, interesting. The page we barfed on is:

Clean page (index 92, ino 1163533, flags 3ffe0000002016) with dirty PTE
(pte_val c0000001ef7b3186) on unmap!

Page flags thus decode to: PG_referenced | PG_uptodate | PG_lru | PG_private
PTE bits decode to: _PAGE_WRITE | _PAGE_READ | _PAGE_DIRTY | _PAGE_ACCESSED |
_PAGE_PTE | _PAGE_PRESENT

So indeed the page was writeably mapped. The question now is, how the page
could have been writeably mapped without getting marked dirty or how could the
dirty bit get cleared while the page stayed writeably mapped.

I'll poke more into the code and probably come up with further debugging patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ