linux-ext4 - Re: d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrUBfVK1yUtuVn-pGzgrq8GQ7_E0sjPBXPaSiPU+Q-C_aA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Dec 2018 07:26:00 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
Cc:     Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        V9FS Developers <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
        "qemu-devel@...gnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation

[sending again, slightly edited, due to email client issues]

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 9:25 AM Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de> wrote:
>
> We have a bit of an interesting problem with respect to the d_off
> field in struct dirent.
>
> When running a 64-bit kernel on certain file systems, notably ext4,
> this field uses the full 63 bits even for small directories (strace -v
> output, wrapped here for readability):
>
> getdents(3, [
>   {d_ino=1494304, d_off=3901177228673045825, d_reclen=40, d_name="authorized_keys", d_type=DT_REG},
>   {d_ino=1494277, d_off=7491915799041650922, d_reclen=24, d_name=".", d_type=DT_DIR},
>   {d_ino=1314655, d_off=9223372036854775807, d_reclen=24, d_name="..", d_type=DT_DIR}
> ], 32768) = 88
>
> When running in 32-bit compat mode, this value is somehow truncated to
> 31 bits, for both the getdents and the getdents64 (!) system call (at
> least on i386).
>

...

>
> However, both qemu-user and the 9p file system can run in such a way
> that the kernel is entered from a 64-bit process, but the actual usage
> is from a 32-bit process:


I imagine that at least some of the problems you're seeing are due to this bug:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/18/859

Presumably the right fix involves modifying the relevant VFS file
operations to indicate the relevant ABI to the implementations.  I
would guess that 9p is triggering the “not really in the syscall you
think you’re in” issue.