lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:16:37 -0200 From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org> To: Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com> Cc: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, libc-alpha@...rceware.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org, ericvh@...il.com, rminnich@...dia.gov, lucho@...kov.net, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de Subject: Re: d_off field in struct dirent and 32-on-64 emulation On 31/12/2018 15:03, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > >>>> Currently we only have nios2 and csky (unfortunately). But since generic >>>> definition for off_t and off64_t still assumes non-LFS support, all new >>>> 32-bits ports potentially might carry the issue. >>> >>> For csky, we could still change the type of the non-standard d_off >>> field to long long int. This way, only telldir would have to fail >>> when truncation is necessary, as mentioned below: >> >> I think it makes no sense to continue making non-LFS as default for >> newer 32 bits ports, the support will be emulated with LFS syscalls. > > Any new 32-bit port that uses 64-bit time_t will also use 64-bit offsets > (because we don't have any glibc configurations that support the > combination of 64-bit time with 32-bit offsets, and don't want to add > them). That should apply for RISC-V 32-bit at least. > > I've filed <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24050> for > missing overflow checks in telldir when the default off_t is wider than > long int (currently just applies to x32; not sure why we don't see glibc > test failures on x32 resulting from the quiet truncation, as the issue is > certainly there in the source code). > What about csky? Should we still make it use 32-bit offsets as default configuration even when kernel does not support it natively?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists