[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hwcgTUpgNCefCGu4DvgkYBp5b=f+hJ+FC=s5APYKoycg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 17:43:26 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Qemu Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Nitesh Narayan Lal <nilal@...hat.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
vishal l verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
dave jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
jmoyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
xiaoguangrong eric <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, lcapitulino@...hat.com,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
adilger kernel <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
darrick wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] kvm "virtio pmem" device
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > On Thu 10-01-19 12:26:17, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > > > This patch series has implementation for "virtio pmem".
> > > > "virtio pmem" is fake persistent memory(nvdimm) in guest
> > > > which allows to bypass the guest page cache. This also
> > > > implements a VIRTIO based asynchronous flush mechanism.
> > >
> > > Hmmmm. Sharing the host page cache direct into the guest VM. Sounds
> > > like a good idea, but.....
> > >
> > > This means the guest VM can now run timing attacks to observe host
> > > side page cache residency, and depending on the implementation I'm
> > > guessing that the guest will be able to control host side page
> > > cache eviction, too (e.g. via discard or hole punch operations).
> > >
> > > Which means this functionality looks to me like a new vector for
> > > information leakage into and out of the guest VM via guest
> > > controlled host page cache manipulation.
> > >
> > > https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.01161
> > >
> > > I might be wrong, but if I'm not we're going to have to be very
> > > careful about how guest VMs can access and manipulate host side
> > > resources like the page cache.....
> >
> > Right. Thinking about this I would be more concerned about the fact that
> > guest can effectively pin amount of host's page cache upto size of the
> > device/file passed to guest as PMEM, can't it Pankaj? Or is there some QEMU
> > magic that avoids this?
>
> Yes, guest will pin these host page cache pages using 'get_user_pages' by
> elevating the page reference count. But these pages can be reclaimed by host
> at any time when there is memory pressure.
Wait, how can the guest pin the host pages? I would expect this to
happen only when using vfio and device assignment. Otherwise, no the
host can't reclaim a pinned page, that's the whole point of a pin to
prevent the mm from reclaiming ownership.
> KVM does not permanently pin pages. vfio does that but we are not using
> it here.
Right, so I'm confused by your pin assertion above.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists