linux-ext4 - Re: [GIT PULL] dtype handling cleanup for v4.21-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiW=4k3iBkDzz5_LuyCRcduZJuk-Vwhz9vqrUMML6WVkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 05:36:06 +1200
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] dtype handling cleanup for v4.21-rc1

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 9:24 PM Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> What has happened to this pull request? It may be too late for this to be
> merged now but I'd like to understand why it was not merged or rejected...

Sorry, initially I left if for later consideration after rc1, and then
I just forgot about it.

I didn't see much point to the cleanup when it actually adds lots of
lines and no actual advantage. The whole dentry type translation
really is fs-specific and it might just happen to be shared. But why
share it if it only adds complexity and unnecessary abstraction?

               Linus