linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix NULL pointer dereference while journal is aborted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <82869475-fc3b-441e-e87b-866e9aa1d93b@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:45:14 +0800
From:   Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix NULL pointer dereference while journal is
 aborted



On 19/3/11 14:35, Jiufei Xue wrote:
> We see the following NULL pointer dereference while running xfstests
> generic/475:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
> PGD 8000000c84bad067 P4D 8000000c84bad067 PUD c84e62067 PMD 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> CPU: 7 PID: 9886 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8 #10
> RIP: 0010:ext4_do_update_inode+0x4ec/0x760
> ...
> Call Trace:
> ? jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x42/0x50
> ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x2c/0x70
> ? ext4_truncate+0x186/0x3f0
> ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0x61/0x80
> ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x62/0x1b0
> ext4_truncate+0x186/0x3f0
> ? unmap_mapping_pages+0x56/0x100
> ext4_setattr+0x817/0x8b0
> notify_change+0x1df/0x430
> do_truncate+0x5e/0x90
> ? generic_permission+0x12b/0x1a0
> 
> This is triggered because the NULL pointer handle->h_transaction was
> dereferenced in function ext4_update_inode_fsync_trans().
> I found that the h_transaction was set to NULL in jbd2__journal_restart
> but failed to attached to a new transaction while the journal is aborted.
> 
> Fix this by checking the handle before updating the inode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@...ux.alibaba.com>

Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>

> ---
>  fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
> index a1ac7e9245ec..75a5309f2231 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static inline void ext4_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle_t *handle,
>  {
>  	struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
>  
> -	if (ext4_handle_valid(handle)) {
> +	if (ext4_handle_valid(handle) && !is_handle_aborted(handle)) {
>  		ei->i_sync_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid;
>  		if (datasync)
>  			ei->i_datasync_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid;
>