lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:33:46 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:     Sven Hartge <sven@...nhartge.de>, 924275@...s.debian.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, control@...s.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#924275: Pulls in lvm2 packages on systems not needing them

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 08:22:08PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> tag 924275 +pending
> thanks
> 
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 09:29:04PM +0100, Sven Hartge wrote:
> > 
> > While I like the new fsck-via-LVM-snapshot feature, I think adding lvm2
> > to Recommends is too agressive here.
> > 
> > On systems not using LVM this will needlessly pull in the whole LVM/DM
> > machinery, including changes to the initramfs, as long as apt is in its
> > default "install-recommends" configuration.
> > 
> > Only on systems where the system admin has changed the default to
> > "no-install-recommends" nothing will happen.
> 
> Agreed; thanks for pointing this out!  I have the following patches
> queued for the next release.

FWIW they look ok to me (who doesn't have auto-install of Recommends),
so:

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>

--D

> 				- Ted
> 

> From 04738f2ff3b8a2acaf2de09856e07601817350b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:41:11 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] e2scrub: check to make sure lvm2 is installed
> 
> Not all systems will have the lvm2 package installed, so check for
> that.  Pretty much all systems should have util-linux installed, but
> check for that as well.
> 
> Of course, if lvm2 is installed we shouldn't find any LVM devices ---
> but eventually the Demon Murphy will find a way to make it happen. :-)
> 
> Also, set the PATH so we don't have to worry about the script failing
> due to /sbin not being in the path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> ---
>  scrub/e2scrub.in     | 12 ++++++++++++
>  scrub/e2scrub_all.in | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scrub/e2scrub.in b/scrub/e2scrub.in
> index e1965db4e..51a909373 100644
> --- a/scrub/e2scrub.in
> +++ b/scrub/e2scrub.in
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>  # check filesystems in VGs that have at least 256MB (or so) of
>  # free space.
>  
> +PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
> +
>  snap_size_mb=256
>  fstrim=0
>  reap=0
> @@ -82,6 +84,16 @@ if [ -z "${arg}" ]; then
>  	exitcode 1
>  fi
>  
> +if ! type lsblk >& /dev/null ; then
> +    echo "e2scrub: can't find lsblk --- is util-linux installed?"
> +    exitcode 1
> +fi
> +
> +if ! type lvcreate >& /dev/null ; then
> +    echo "e2scrub: can't find lvcreate --- is lvm2 installed?"
> +    exitcode 1
> +fi
> +
>  # Find the device for a given mountpoint
>  dev_from_mount() {
>  	local mountpt="$(realpath "$1")"
> diff --git a/scrub/e2scrub_all.in b/scrub/e2scrub_all.in
> index 23d122d25..d725a7f2e 100644
> --- a/scrub/e2scrub_all.in
> +++ b/scrub/e2scrub_all.in
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>  #  along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
>  #  Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301, USA.
>  
> +PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
> +
>  scrub_all=0
>  conffile="@root_sysconfdir@...scrub.conf"
>  
> @@ -68,6 +70,20 @@ while getopts "ArV" opt; do
>  done
>  shift "$((OPTIND - 1))"
>  
> +# If some prerequisite packages are not installed, exit with a code
> +# indicating success to avoid spamming the sysadmin with fail messages
> +# when e2scrub_all is run out of cron or a systemd timer.
> +
> +if ! type lsblk >& /dev/null ; then
> +    echo "e2scrub_all: can't find lsblk --- is util-linux installed?"
> +    exitcode 0
> +fi
> +
> +if ! type lvcreate >& /dev/null ; then
> +    echo "e2scrub_all: can't find lvcreate --- is lvm2 installed?"
> +    exitcode 0
> +fi
> +
>  # Find scrub targets, make sure we only do this once.
>  ls_scrub_targets() {
>  	lsblk -o NAME,FSTYPE,MOUNTPOINT -p -P -n | while read vars; do
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 

> From 212ba2a8a81001bce21cce314f9bc2967f2df7c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:01:58 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] debian: drop lvm2 from the recommends line
> 
> If the user doesn't intend to use lvm2, and it's not installed,
> installing e2fsprogs shouldn't drag it (and all of its dependencies)
> into the system.
> 
> Addresses-Debian-Bug: 924275
> 
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> ---
>  debian/control | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index 1bb8adb15..e454687f9 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ XB-Important: yes
>  Pre-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libblkid1, libuuid1
>  Multi-Arch: foreign
>  Suggests: gpart, parted, fuse2fs, e2fsck-static
> -Recommends: e2fsprogs-l10n, lvm2
> +Recommends: e2fsprogs-l10n
>  Architecture: any
>  Description: ext2/ext3/ext4 file system utilities
>   The ext2, ext3 and ext4 file systems are successors of the original ext
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ