lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:31:35 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:04:15PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:

> > What's to stop you from doing just that right now?  You'd need to take
> > care with barriers, but you'd need that anyway... As soon as ->i_link is set
> > you'll get no more ->get_link() on that sucker, using the cached value
> > from that point on.  IDGI...
> 
> 1.) The VFS won't know to drop of RCU-walk mode, so waiting an RCU grace period
>     before freeing the symlink target becomes mandatory.  (Which I'd like to do
>     for fscrypt anyway, but doing it sanely appears to require implementing
>     .destroy_inode() for ext4, f2fs, and ubifs.  I hoped I could do non-RCU mode
>     as a simpler first step.)

You might want to check those filesystems.  All three you've mentioned *have*
->destroy_inode() already.
 
> 2.) The VFS won't know to use a read memory barrier when loading i_link.
>     The VFS could issue one unconditionally, but it would be unnecessary for
>     regular fast symlinks.

Not really.  All we need on the read side is READ_ONCE(); it will supply
smp_read_barrier_depends() (which is a no-op except for alpha).  On the
write side we need smp_store_release() to set ->i_link (in addition to
whatever serialization we want for actual calculation of the value to
be cached, of course).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists