[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190410082804.GG1426@quack2.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:28:04 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
zwisler@...nel.org, vishal.l.verma@...el.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, hch@...radead.org, lenb@...nel.org,
jack@...e.cz, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
darrick.wong@...cle.com, lcapitulino@...hat.com, kwolf@...hat.com,
imammedo@...hat.com, jmoyer@...hat.com, nilal@...hat.com,
riel@...riel.com, stefanha@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
david@...hat.com, david@...morbit.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
kilobyte@...band.pl, yuval.shaia@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] libnvdimm: add dax_dev sync flag
On Wed 10-04-19 09:38:23, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> @@ -64,6 +65,10 @@ static inline bool dax_write_cache_enabled(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
> {
> return false;
> }
> +static inline bool dax_synchronous(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
Is there a need to define dax_synchronous() for !CONFIG_DAX? Because that
property of dax device is pretty much undefined and I don't see anything
needing to call it for !CONFIG_DAX...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists