[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190410210657.GA2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 22:06:57 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vfs: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_link
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 01:21:14PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>
> Use 'READ_ONCE(inode->i_link)' to explicitly support filesystems caching
> the symlink target in ->i_link later if it was unavailable at iget()
> time, or wasn't easily available. I'll be doing this in fscrypt, to
> improve the performance of encrypted symlinks on ext4, f2fs, and ubifs.
>
> ->i_link will start NULL and may later be set to a non-NULL value by a
> smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release(). READ_ONCE() is needed on the
> read side. smp_load_acquire() is unnecessary because only a data
> dependency barrier is required. (Thanks to Al for pointing this out.)
You've missed vfs_readlink()...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists