lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:50:15 -0400
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Sarthak Kukreti <sarthakkukreti@...omium.org>,
        Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] fscrypt: clean up and improve dentry revalidation

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 05:10:42PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> 
> Hi Ted, I assumed you resolved the conflict with "fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to
> access ->i_crypt_info"?  The code in fscrypt_d_revalidate() should be:
> 
>         dir = dget_parent(dentry);
>         err = fscrypt_get_encryption_info(d_inode(dir));
>         valid = !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(d_inode(dir));
>         dput(dir);

Yes, I did notice the patch conflict.  Thanks for confirming the
correct resolution!

						- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists