[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7402364.ucYHGh3o57@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:29:10 +0530
From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, ebiggers@...nel.org, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
yuchao0@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 02/14] Consolidate "post read processing" into a new file
On Wednesday, April 24, 2019 7:54:23 PM IST Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:34:17PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > To clarify, Are you suggesting that a new kconfig option (say
> > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS) be provided to the user so that the following could
> > occur,
> >
> > 1. User selects CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION and/or CONFIG_FS_VERITY and this causes
> > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS to be set to 'y'.
> > 2. User selects CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS explicitly.
>
> If you don't add a user description to a Kconfig entry it won't be
> visible to users, but only selectable by other options. That is what
> I suggest.
>
>
Thanks for the clarification. I will make the necessary changes.
--
chandan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists