linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 05/13] fscrypt: introduce fscrypt_encrypt_block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <5212233.NpK8FDItVt@dhcp-9-109-212-164>
Date:   Mon, 06 May 2019 14:07:31 +0530
From:   Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] fscrypt: introduce fscrypt_encrypt_block_inplace()

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 4:15:07 AM IST Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> 
> fscrypt_encrypt_page() behaves very differently depending on whether the
> filesystem set FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES in its fscrypt_operations.  This makes
> the function difficult to understand and document.  It also makes it so
> that all callers have to provide inode and lblk_num, when fscrypt could
> determine these itself for pagecache pages.
> 
> Therefore, move the FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES behavior into a new function
> fscrypt_encrypt_block_inplace().

Looks good to me,

Reviewed-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.ibm.com>

-- 
chandan