linux-ext4 - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/6] dax: check synchronous mapping is supported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 May 2019 01:31:18 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
To:     Jakub Staroń <jstaron@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, mst@...hat.com,
        jasowang@...hat.com, david@...morbit.com, lcapitulino@...hat.com,
        adilger kernel <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, zwisler@...nel.org,
        aarcange@...hat.com, dave jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        darrick wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        vishal l verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, david@...hat.com,
        willy@...radead.org, hch@...radead.org, jmoyer@...hat.com,
        nilal@...hat.com, lenb@...nel.org, kilobyte@...band.pl,
        riel@...riel.com, yuval shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>,
        stefanha@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        dan j williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, kwolf@...hat.com,
        tytso@....edu, xiaoguangrong eric <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
        cohuck@...hat.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, imammedo@...hat.com,
        Stephen Barber <smbarber@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/6] dax: check synchronous mapping is
 supported


> 
> From: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
> Date: Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:00 PM
> 
> > +static inline bool daxdev_mapping_supported(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                               struct dax_device *dax_dev)
> > +{
> > +       return !(vma->flags & VM_SYNC);
> > +}
> 
> Shouldn't it be rather `return !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SYNC);`? There is
> no field named `flags` in `struct vm_area_struct`.

Thanks for catching. Sorry! for this. 

Will correct in v8.

Thank you,
Pankaj 

> 
> Thank you,
> Jakub
>