lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 22:09:30 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] ext4: fix two cases where a u32 is being checked for a less than zero error return On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:09:08PM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> > > There are two cases where u32 variables n and err are being checked > for less than zero error values, the checks is always false because > the variables are not signed. Fix this by making the variables ints. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0") > Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> Thanks, applied. - Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists