linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] fstests: generic, fsync fuzz tester with fsstress

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190516165921.GA4023@mit.edu>
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 12:59:21 -0400
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...nel.org>
Cc:     fstests <fstests@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: generic, fsync fuzz tester with fsstress

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> 
> Haven't tried ext4 with 1 process only (instead of 4), but I can try
> to see if it happens without concurrency as well.

How many CPU's and how much memory were you using?  And I assume this
was using KVM/QEMU?  How was it configured?

Thanks,

					- Ted