[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190521164407.GA20674@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 18:44:07 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@...ernode.on.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Subject: Re: ext4 regression (was Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/105] 4.19.45-stable
review)
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 06:30:12PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:21:42PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 03:58:15PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > > Ted, any ideas here? Should I drop this from the stable trees, and you
> > > > revert it from Linus's? Or something else?
> >
> > It's safe to drop this from the stable trees while we investigate. It
> > was always borderline for stable anyway. (See below).
>
> Ok, will go drop both of these now, thanks.
I have now pushed out -rc2 releases for 5.1, 5.0, and 4.19 with 3 ext4
patches dropped from each series as there was the original patch here,
and then 2 others on top of that.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists