[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afa54281eaf134b892d5f93d281d7ddf75bfe3a5.camel@zoho.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:07:05 +0800
From: "cgxu519@...o.com.cn" <cgxu519@...o.com.cn>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: optimize ext2_xattr_get()
On Thu, 2019-05-23 at 16:46 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 21-05-19 16:21:39, Chengguang Xu wrote:
> > Since xattr entry names are sorted, we don't have
> > to continue when current entry name is greater than
> > target.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@...o.com.cn>
>
> Thanks for the patch! If we are going to do these comparisons in multiple
> places, then please create a helper function to do the comparison (so that
> we have the same comparison in every place). Something like:
>
> int ext2_xattr_cmp(int name_index, size_t name_len, const char *name,
> struct ext2_xattr_entry *entry)
>
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the review and advice.
You are right we should introduce a helper to handle this part of work
and personally I think maybe implementing a helper to find target entry
will be more useful, do you think it makes sense?
Thanks,
Chengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists