[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190528034830.GH10043@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 09:18:30 +0530
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsync_mode mount option for ext4
Hi Ted,
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 11:40:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:52:57AM +0530, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > Hi Ted, Andreas,
> >
> > Do you think this mount option "fsync_mode=nobarrier"
> > can be added for EXT4 as well like in F2FS? Please
> > share your thoughts on this.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/908934/
>
> Ext4 already has the nobarrier mount option.
>
Yes, but fsync_mode=nobarrier is little different than
a general nobarrier option. The fsync_mode=nobarrier is
only controlling the flush policy for fsync() path, unlike
the nobarrier mount option which is applicable at all
places in the filesystem.
Thanks,
> Cheers,
>
> - Ted
--
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists