linux-ext4 - [Bug 203943] ext4 corruption after RAID6 degraded; e2fsck skips block checks and fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bug-203943-13602-TNwOaykekc@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:52:01 +0000
From:   bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 203943] ext4 corruption after RAID6 degraded; e2fsck skips
 block checks and fails

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203943

--- Comment #3 from Yann Ormanns (yann@...anns.net) ---
Andreas & Ted, thank you for your replies.

(In reply to Andreas Dilger from comment #1)
> This seems like a RAID problem and not an ext4 problem. The RAID array
> shouldn't be returning random garbage if one of the drives is unavailable.
> Maybe it is not doing data parity verification on reads, so that it is
> blindly returning bad blocks from the failed drive rather than
> reconstructing valid data from parity if the drive does not fail completely?

How can I check that? At least running "checkarray" did not find anything new
or helpful.

(In reply to Theodore Tso from comment #2)
> Did you resync the disks *before* you ran e2fsck?   Or only afterwards?

1. my RAID6 got degraded and ext4 errors showed up
2. I ran e2fsck, it consumed all  memory and showed only "Inode %$i block %$b
conflicts with critical metadata, skipping block checks."
3. I replaced the faulty disk and resynced the RAID6
4. e2fsck was able to clean the filesystem
5. I simulated a drive fault (so my RAID6 had n+1 working disks left)
6. the ext4 FS got corrupted again
7. although the RAID is clean again, e2fsck is not able to clean the FS (like
in step 2)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.