linux-ext4 - [PATCH] ext4: fix warning when turn on dioread_nolock and inline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1562244632-134963-1-git-send-email-yangerkun@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jul 2019 20:50:32 +0800
From:   yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
To:     <tytso@....edu>, <jack@...e.com>
CC:     <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <yangerkun@...wei.com>,
        <houtao1@...wei.com>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <miaoxie@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix warning when turn on dioread_nolock and inline_data

mkfs.ext4 -O inline_data /dev/vdb
mount -o dioread_nolock /dev/vdb /mnt
echo "some inline data..." >> /mnt/test-file
echo "some inline data..." >> /mnt/test-file
sync

With upon script, system will trigger
"WARN_ON(!io_end->handle && sbi->s_journal)" since the wrong order
between rsv_blocks calculate and destroy inline data for dealloc.

Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index c7f77c6..3f2a366 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2769,15 +2769,6 @@ static int ext4_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
 		goto out_writepages;
 	}
 
-	if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
-		/*
-		 * We may need to convert up to one extent per block in
-		 * the page and we may dirty the inode.
-		 */
-		rsv_blocks = 1 + ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode,
-						PAGE_SIZE >> inode->i_blkbits);
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * If we have inline data and arrive here, it means that
 	 * we will soon create the block for the 1st page, so
@@ -2796,6 +2787,15 @@ static int ext4_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
 		ext4_journal_stop(handle);
 	}
 
+	if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
+		/*
+		 * We may need to convert up to one extent per block in
+		 * the page and we may dirty the inode.
+		 */
+		rsv_blocks = 1 + ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode,
+						PAGE_SIZE >> inode->i_blkbits);
+	}
+
 	if (wbc->range_start == 0 && wbc->range_end == LLONG_MAX)
 		range_whole = 1;
 
-- 
2.7.4